What To Know
- The E-M1 Mark II has a splash-proof and dustproof design, which offers some protection but is not as robust as the D750’s weather sealing.
- The E-M1 Mark II uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, which has a smaller lens selection but offers the advantage of being more compact and lightweight.
- The D750 is a full-frame DSLR, which makes it larger and heavier than the E-M1 Mark II.
In the realm of photography, the Nikon D750 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II stand as formidable contenders. Both cameras boast impressive features and capabilities, making them coveted choices among photographers of all levels. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between these two photography powerhouses to help you make an informed decision.
Image Quality
The D750 features a 24.3MP FX-format CMOS sensor, while the E-M1 Mark II has a 20.4MP Four Thirds sensor. Despite the difference in resolution, both cameras deliver sharp and detailed images. The D750 offers slightly better dynamic range, allowing for greater flexibility in post-processing.
Autofocus
The D750’s 51-point autofocus system is renowned for its accuracy and speed. The E-M1 Mark II’s 121-point contrast-detect autofocus is equally impressive, providing fast and precise focusing even in low-light conditions. However, the D750’s phase-detect autofocus has an edge in tracking moving subjects.
Burst Shooting
The D750 can shoot up to 6 frames per second (fps), while the E-M1 Mark II boasts an impressive 60fps burst rate. This makes the E-M1 Mark II an excellent choice for capturing fast-paced action or wildlife.
Weather Resistance
The D750 is weather-sealed, making it suitable for use in harsh conditions. The E-M1 Mark II has a splash-proof and dustproof design, which offers some protection but is not as robust as the D750’s weather sealing.
Lens Compatibility
The D750 uses the Nikon F-mount, which gives access to a wide range of lenses. The E-M1 Mark II uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, which has a smaller lens selection but offers the advantage of being more compact and lightweight.
Sensor Stabilization
The E-M1 Mark II features in-body 5-axis image stabilization, which helps reduce camera shake and allows for sharper handheld shots. The D750 does not have in-body stabilization, but many of its lenses feature optical image stabilization.
Video Capabilities
The D750 and E-M1 Mark II both offer excellent video capabilities. The D750 can shoot 4K video at 30fps, while the E-M1 Mark II can shoot 4K at 60fps. Both cameras support 10-bit video and have external microphone inputs for high-quality audio recording.
Portability
The D750 is a full-frame DSLR, which makes it larger and heavier than the E-M1 Mark II. The E-M1 Mark II’s Micro Four Thirds design results in a smaller and more portable body, making it ideal for travel or street photography.
Price
The D750 is typically more affordable than the E-M1 Mark II, making it a more budget-friendly option for photographers.
Recommendations: The Victor Emerges
The Nikon D750 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II are both exceptional cameras that offer different strengths and weaknesses. The D750 excels in image quality, weather resistance, and lens compatibility, while the E-M1 Mark II impresses with its burst shooting speed, sensor stabilization, and portability. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your individual photography needs and preferences.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
Q: Which camera has better image quality?
A: The D750 has slightly better image quality due to its larger sensor and higher dynamic range.
Q: Which camera is better for fast-paced photography?
A: The E-M1 Mark II has a faster burst shooting speed, making it more suitable for capturing action or wildlife.
Q: Which camera is more portable?
A: The E-M1 Mark II is more portable due to its smaller and lighter body.
Q: Which camera has better video capabilities?
A: Both cameras offer excellent video capabilities, but the E-M1 Mark II has a higher frame rate for 4K video.
Q: Which camera is more affordable?
A: The D750 is typically more affordable than the E-M1 Mark II.
