What To Know
- While the D3300 is a decent entry-level DSLR, the D3400 is a better investment for photographers looking for a more capable and versatile camera.
- The D3400 has a wider ISO range and a more advanced autofocus system, making it better for low-light photography.
- The D3400 has a longer battery life, allowing you to capture more shots on a single charge.
The Nikon D3400 and D3300 are two popular entry-level DSLRs that offer aspiring photographers an affordable way to embark on their photographic journey. While they share some similarities, there are notable differences that set them apart. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key aspects of these two cameras to help you make an informed decision.
Sensor and Image Quality
Both the D3400 and D3300 feature a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor. However, the D3400 has an updated sensor with no optical low-pass filter, resulting in slightly sharper images with finer details. The D3400 also has a wider ISO range of 100-25600 (expandable to 51200) compared to the D3300’s ISO range of 100-12800. This gives the D3400 an edge in low-light situations.
Autofocus System
The D3400 boasts a more advanced autofocus system than the D3300. It features 11 autofocus points, including one cross-type point, while the D3300 has only 9 autofocus points, all of which are single-type. The D3400’s autofocus system is more responsive and accurate, especially in low-light conditions.
Viewfinder and Live View
Both cameras have a 0.85x magnification viewfinder with approximately 95% coverage. However, the D3400’s viewfinder offers a slightly brighter and more detailed view. The D3400 also has a better live view experience. It features a higher-resolution 3-inch LCD screen with a vari-angle design, allowing you to shoot from various angles.
Continuous Shooting Speed
The D3400 has a faster continuous shooting speed than the D3300. It can capture up to 5 frames per second (fps) in continuous shooting mode, while the D3300 can only manage 4 fps. This makes the D3400 better suited for capturing fast-paced action or sports.
Battery Life
The D3400 has a longer battery life than the D3300. It can capture approximately 1200 shots on a single charge, compared to the D3300’s 700 shots. This makes the D3400 more suitable for extended shooting sessions or travel photography.
Video Recording
Both the D3400 and D3300 can record Full HD (1080p) video at up to 60 fps. However, the D3400 offers more advanced video features, including the ability to record time-lapse videos and use an external microphone for improved audio quality.
In a nutshell
The Nikon D3400 is the clear winner in this comparison. It offers a more advanced sensor, autofocus system, viewfinder, live view experience, continuous shooting speed, battery life, and video recording capabilities compared to the D3300. While the D3300 is a decent entry-level DSLR, the D3400 is a better investment for photographers looking for a more capable and versatile camera.
Popular Questions
Q: Which camera is better for beginners?
A: Both the D3400 and D3300 are suitable for beginners, but the D3400 is easier to use and has more user-friendly features.
Q: Which camera takes better photos in low light?
A: The D3400 has a wider ISO range and a more advanced autofocus system, making it better for low-light photography.
Q: Which camera has a better autofocus system?
A: The D3400 has a more advanced autofocus system with 11 autofocus points, including one cross-type point.
Q: Which camera has a longer battery life?
A: The D3400 has a longer battery life, allowing you to capture more shots on a single charge.
Q: Which camera is better for video recording?
A: The D3400 has more advanced video recording features, including the ability to record time-lapse videos and use an external microphone.
