Mastering the art of DSLR shooting
Guide

Nikon D3300 Vs Olympus Om-d E-m10 Mark Ii

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.

What To Know

  • While the higher resolution of the D3300 may suggest a superior image quality, the smaller sensor size of the E-M10 Mark II compensates with improved low-light performance and a wider dynamic range.
  • The Nikon D3300 employs a 11-point autofocus system, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II utilizes a 325-point autofocus system.
  • Both the Nikon D3300 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II offer a range of features and functionality designed to enhance the user experience.

In the realm of entry-level mirrorless cameras, the Nikon D3300 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II stand as formidable contenders. Both offer an array of features and capabilities that cater to aspiring photographers seeking to elevate their imaging game. However, discerning the finer nuances that set these cameras apart can be a daunting task. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between the Nikon D3300 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II, empowering you to make an informed decision and unlock your photographic potential.

Image Quality

The Nikon D3300 boasts a 24.2-megapixel APS-C sensor, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II features a 16.1-megapixel Four Thirds sensor. While the higher resolution of the D3300 may suggest a superior image quality, the smaller sensor size of the E-M10 Mark II compensates with improved low-light performance and a wider dynamic range. In practical terms, both cameras deliver impressive image quality, with the D3300 excelling in high-resolution detail and the E-M10 Mark II offering greater versatility in low-light conditions.

Autofocus

The Nikon D3300 employs a 11-point autofocus system, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II utilizes a 325-point autofocus system. The E-M10 Mark II’s significantly higher number of autofocus points translates into faster and more accurate focusing, particularly in low-light situations and when tracking moving subjects. This advantage makes the E-M10 Mark II a more suitable choice for capturing fast-paced action or wildlife photography.

Lens Compatibility

Lens compatibility is a crucial consideration when investing in a camera system. The Nikon D3300 accepts Nikon F-mount lenses, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II utilizes Micro Four Thirds lenses. The F-mount system offers a wider selection of lenses, including both Nikon and third-party options. However, the Micro Four Thirds system is more compact and lightweight, making it ideal for travel and street photography.

Size and Weight

The Nikon D3300 is slightly larger and heavier than the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II. The D3300 measures 124 x 98 x 75.5 mm and weighs 460 grams, while the E-M10 Mark II measures 120 x 84 x 49 mm and weighs 390 grams. The smaller size and lighter weight of the E-M10 Mark II make it more portable and comfortable to carry for extended periods.

Features and Functionality

Both the Nikon D3300 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II offer a range of features and functionality designed to enhance the user experience. The D3300 features a built-in pop-up flash, while the E-M10 Mark II offers a hot shoe for attaching an external flash. The E-M10 Mark II also includes a built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, enabling seamless image sharing and remote camera control.

Video Capabilities

The Nikon D3300 can record Full HD 1080p video at 60 fps, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II offers 4K video recording at 30 fps. The higher resolution of the E-M10 Mark II’s video footage provides greater detail and clarity, making it a more suitable choice for aspiring videographers.

Which Camera is Right for You?

The choice between the Nikon D3300 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize high resolution and a wide lens selection, the D3300 is a solid option. However, if you value portability, fast and accurate autofocus, and advanced video capabilities, the E-M10 Mark II is the better choice.

The Ultimate Showdown: Nikon D3300 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II

Image Quality: Nikon D3300 (higher resolution) vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (better low-light performance)
Autofocus: Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (faster and more accurate)
Lens Compatibility: Nikon D3300 (wider selection) vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (more compact and lightweight)
Size and Weight: Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (smaller and lighter)
Features and Functionality: Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, hot shoe)
Video Capabilities: Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (4K video recording)

What You Need to Know

Q: Which camera has a longer battery life?
A: The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II has a longer battery life than the Nikon D3300, with approximately 320 shots per charge compared to 700 shots per charge.

Q: Is the Nikon D3300 weather-sealed?
A: No, the Nikon D3300 is not weather-sealed.

Q: Can I use Nikon lenses on the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II?
A: Yes, you can use Nikon lenses on the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with an adapter.

Was this page helpful?

Drew D.

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.
Back to top button