What To Know
- The SL3 utilizes a 9-point phase-detection autofocus system with 1 cross-type point, while the RP employs a faster and more advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 4779 selectable points.
- The SL3 can capture up to 5 frames per second (fps) in continuous shooting mode, while the RP can shoot up to 5 fps in single-shot AF and 4 fps in continuous AF.
- The SL3 has a buffer capacity of 11 RAW images or 60 JPEGs, while the RP has a buffer of 50 RAW images or 100 JPEGs.
The Canon SL3 and RP are two popular mirrorless cameras that cater to different photography needs and budgets. Both cameras offer impressive features, but understanding their strengths and weaknesses is crucial to make an informed decision. This comprehensive guide will compare the Canon SL3 vs RP, highlighting their key differences, advantages, and disadvantages to help you choose the best camera for your specific requirements.
Sensor and Image Quality
The Canon SL3 features a 24.1-megapixel APS-C sensor, while the RP boasts a full-frame 26.2-megapixel sensor. Full-frame sensors offer several advantages, including better low-light performance, wider dynamic range, and shallower depth of field. However, APS-C sensors are smaller and lighter, resulting in a more compact camera size and affordability.
Autofocus and Performance
The SL3 utilizes a 9-point phase-detection autofocus system with 1 cross-type point, while the RP employs a faster and more advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 4779 selectable points. The RP’s superior autofocus system provides faster and more accurate focusing, particularly in low-light conditions.
Burst Shooting and Buffer
The SL3 can capture up to 5 frames per second (fps) in continuous shooting mode, while the RP can shoot up to 5 fps in single-shot AF and 4 fps in continuous AF. The SL3 has a buffer capacity of 11 RAW images or 60 JPEGs, while the RP has a buffer of 50 RAW images or 100 JPEGs. The RP’s larger buffer allows for longer continuous shooting bursts.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras offer 4K video recording at 24p and 30p. However, the RP supports 4K recording with no crop, while the SL3 crops the video to 1.6x. The RP also features a built-in microphone jack, allowing for external audio recording.
Body and Ergonomics
The SL3 is a compact and lightweight camera, weighing approximately 449 grams. It has a traditional DSLR-like design with a built-in flash. The RP, on the other hand, is slightly larger and heavier at 485 grams. It has a more minimalist design with a larger electronic viewfinder (EVF).
Lens Compatibility
The SL3 uses Canon’s EF-S lens mount, while the RP uses the RF lens mount. EF-S lenses are smaller and lighter than RF lenses, but they are only compatible with APS-C cameras. RF lenses are more versatile and can be used on both APS-C and full-frame cameras.
Price and Availability
The Canon SL3 is priced around $599, while the RP is priced around $1,299. The SL3 is available in both body-only and kit configurations, while the RP is only available as a body-only camera.
Which Camera is Right for You?
The Canon SL3 is a great option for beginners or photographers looking for a compact and affordable mirrorless camera. It offers good image quality, a decent autofocus system, and a variety of lens options.
The Canon RP is a better choice for photographers who want a full-frame camera with advanced features. It offers superior image quality, a faster and more accurate autofocus system, and a wider range of lens compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which camera has better low-light performance?
A: The Canon RP has better low-light performance due to its larger full-frame sensor.
Q: Which camera has a faster autofocus system?
A: The Canon RP has a faster and more accurate autofocus system than the SL3.
Q: Which camera is more compact and lightweight?
A: The Canon SL3 is more compact and lightweight than the RP.
Q: Which camera has a built-in flash?
A: The Canon SL3 has a built-in flash, while the RP does not.
Q: Which camera has a larger buffer capacity?
A: The Canon RP has a larger buffer capacity than the SL3.
