Mastering the art of DSLR shooting
Guide

Canon Sl3 Vs 200d Ii: Unboxing And Comparison Review You Can’t Miss

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.

What To Know

  • However, the SL3 has a slight advantage in dynamic range, allowing it to capture a wider tonal range in high-contrast scenes.
  • The SL3 has a slight edge in terms of continuous shooting speed, capturing up to 5 frames per second (fps) compared to the 200D II’s 3 fps.
  • While the SL3 provides a slight edge in dynamic range and continuous shooting speed, the 200D II excels in autofocus performance and ISO handling.

The Canon SL3 and 200D II are two entry-level DSLR cameras that have garnered significant attention from aspiring photographers. Both cameras offer a range of features and capabilities that make them ideal for beginners, but they also have some key differences that may influence your decision. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the similarities and distinctions between the Canon SL3 and 200D II, helping you make an informed choice for your photography journey.

Image Quality

The Canon SL3 and 200D II share the same 24.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor, ensuring comparable image quality. They both produce sharp and detailed images with accurate color reproduction. However, the SL3 has a slight advantage in dynamic range, allowing it to capture a wider tonal range in high-contrast scenes.

Autofocus

The 200D II boasts a more advanced autofocus system than the SL3. It features 9 autofocus points, including 1 cross-type point, providing faster and more accurate focusing, especially when shooting moving subjects. The SL3, on the other hand, has 3 autofocus points, limiting its focus capabilities in low-light conditions or when tracking fast-moving objects.

ISO Performance

Both cameras have a native ISO range of 100-25600, expandable to 51200. At low ISO values, both cameras produce clean and noise-free images. However, as you push the ISO higher, the 200D II exhibits slightly less noise than the SL3, resulting in better image quality in low-light conditions.

Continuous Shooting

The SL3 has a slight edge in terms of continuous shooting speed, capturing up to 5 frames per second (fps) compared to the 200D II’s 3 fps. This difference may be significant for capturing action sequences or wildlife shots where fast shutter speeds are required.

Display and Viewfinder

The Canon SL3 features a fully articulating 3-inch touchscreen display, allowing you to easily shoot at high or low angles and review your images. The 200D II, on the other hand, has a fixed 3-inch non-touchscreen display, which may be less convenient for certain shooting scenarios. Both cameras have optical viewfinders with approximately 95% field of view.

Ergonomics and Handling

The SL3 is slightly smaller and lighter than the 200D II, making it more portable for travel or everyday shooting. It also features a dedicated mode dial on the top plate, providing quick and easy access to different shooting modes. The 200D II has a more traditional control layout, with a top-mounted LCD panel for displaying shooting information.

Connectivity and Features

Both cameras offer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, allowing you to transfer images and control your camera remotely using the Canon Camera Connect app. The SL3 has the added advantage of built-in NFC (Near Field Communication), making it easy to connect to compatible devices with a simple touch. Additionally, the 200D II features a built-in interval timer, enabling you to capture time-lapse sequences without the need for an external intervalometer.

Takeaways: Choosing the Right Camera for Your Needs

The Canon SL3 and 200D II are both excellent entry-level DSLR cameras that offer a combination of affordability and features. While the SL3 provides a slight edge in dynamic range and continuous shooting speed, the 200D II excels in autofocus performance and ISO handling. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize portability, fast shooting, and a fully articulating screen, the SL3 is an ideal option. If you value advanced autofocus, low-light performance, and a more traditional control layout, the 200D II is a better choice.

Quick Answers to Your FAQs

Q: Which camera has better video capabilities?
A: Both cameras offer 1080p video recording at up to 60 fps. However, the 200D II supports 4K video recording, while the SL3 does not.

Q: Can I use the same lenses with both cameras?
A: Yes, both cameras are compatible with Canon EF and EF-S lenses.

Q: Which camera is better for low-light photography?
A: The 200D II has a slight advantage in low-light performance due to its improved ISO handling.

Q: Does the SL3 have a built-in flash?
A: Yes, the SL3 has a built-in pop-up flash.

Q: Does the 200D II have a mic input?
A: No, the 200D II does not have a built-in mic input.

Was this page helpful?

Drew D.

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.
Back to top button