What To Know
- The R50 has a Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 651 autofocus points, while the 200D Mark II has a 9-point autofocus system.
- The R50’s autofocus system is much faster and more accurate than the 200D Mark II’s, making it a better choice for shooting fast-moving subjects or in low-light conditions.
- The 200D Mark II is more affordable than the R50, with a body-only price of $549 compared to $699 for the R50.
The world of photography is constantly evolving, with new and innovative cameras hitting the market all the time. Two of the latest releases from Canon are the R50 and the 200D Mark II, and both cameras have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. In this blog post, we’ll compare the Canon R50 vs Canon 200D Mark II to help you decide which camera is right for you.
Image Quality
One of the most important factors to consider when choosing a camera is image quality. Both the R50 and the 200D Mark II produce excellent image quality, but there are some key differences between the two cameras.
The R50 has a 24.2-megapixel full-frame sensor, while the 200D Mark II has a 24.1-megapixel APS-C sensor. Full-frame sensors are larger than APS-C sensors, which means they can capture more light and produce images with less noise. This makes the R50 a better choice for low-light photography and for shooting in high ISO settings.
Autofocus
Another important factor to consider is autofocus. The R50 has a Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 651 autofocus points, while the 200D Mark II has a 9-point autofocus system. The R50’s autofocus system is much faster and more accurate than the 200D Mark II’s, making it a better choice for shooting fast-moving subjects or in low-light conditions.
Video
If you’re interested in shooting video, the R50 is the clear winner. The R50 can shoot 4K video at up to 30 frames per second, while the 200D Mark II can only shoot 1080p video at up to 60 frames per second. The R50 also has a built-in microphone input, which allows you to connect an external microphone for better audio quality.
Portability
If you’re looking for a camera that you can easily take with you everywhere you go, the 200D Mark II is the better choice. The 200D Mark II is smaller and lighter than the R50, making it easier to carry around. The 200D Mark II also has a longer battery life than the R50, so you can shoot for longer periods of time without having to worry about running out of power.
Price
The R50 is more expensive than the 200D Mark II. The R50 body-only costs $699, while the 200D Mark II body-only costs $549. If you’re on a budget, the 200D Mark II is the better choice.
Which Camera is Right for You?
The Canon R50 and the Canon 200D Mark II are both excellent cameras, but they have different strengths and weaknesses. The R50 is a better choice for photographers who want the best possible image quality, autofocus, and video capabilities. The 200D Mark II is a better choice for photographers who want a more portable and affordable camera.
Summary
Ultimately, the best way to decide which camera is right for you is to try them both out and see which one you prefer. Both the R50 and the 200D Mark II are great cameras, and they both have their own unique advantages.
Answers to Your Questions
Q: Which camera has better image quality?
A: The R50 has better image quality than the 200D Mark II, thanks to its larger full-frame sensor.
Q: Which camera has better autofocus?
A: The R50 has better autofocus than the 200D Mark II, thanks to its Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 651 autofocus points.
Q: Which camera is better for video?
A: The R50 is better for video than the 200D Mark II, thanks to its ability to shoot 4K video at up to 30 frames per second.
Q: Which camera is more portable?
A: The 200D Mark II is more portable than the R50, thanks to its smaller size and lighter weight.
Q: Which camera is more affordable?
A: The 200D Mark II is more affordable than the R50, with a body-only price of $549 compared to $699 for the R50.
