Mastering the art of DSLR shooting
Comparison

Unboxing the Canon EOS RP: Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM vs Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM – Which is Right for You?

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.

What To Know

  • Choosing the right lens for your Canon EOS RP can be a daunting task, especially when faced with the allure of both the versatile Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.
  • If you’re looking for a budget-friendly lens that offers a good balance of quality and versatility, the EF 24-105mm might be the ideal choice.
  • However, if you’re willing to invest in a lens that offers exceptional zoom range and performance, the RF 24-240mm is a worthy investment.

Choosing the right lens for your Canon EOS RP can be a daunting task, especially when faced with the allure of both the versatile Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the impressive Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM. Both lenses offer a wide zoom range, making them appealing for various photography styles, but their differences lie in their focal lengths, maximum apertures, and autofocus systems.
This blog post aims to help you understand the key differences between these two lenses, guiding you towards the ideal choice for your photography needs and budget.

Comparing the Giants: Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM boasts a standard zoom range, covering wide-angle to telephoto perspectives. This lens is a classic choice for everyday photography, landscapes, portraits, and even some wildlife shots. The Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM, on the other hand, takes versatility to a whole new level with its superzoom capability. This lens offers a remarkable range from wide-angle to super-telephoto, allowing you to capture everything from expansive landscapes to distant subjects with ease.

The Aperture Advantage: Light Gathering and Depth of Field

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM offers a maximum aperture of f/3.5 at the wide end and f/5.6 at the telephoto end. While this aperture range is decent, it might limit your ability to shoot in low-light conditions or achieve shallow depth of field for creative portraiture. The Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM, despite its longer focal length, provides a slightly wider maximum aperture of f/4.6 at the wide end and f/6.3 at the telephoto end. This wider aperture allows for better low-light performance and offers more flexibility in controlling depth of field.

Autofocus Showdown: Speed and Precision

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM utilizes a stepping motor (STM) for autofocus, offering quiet and smooth operation, especially during video recording. However, it might not be as fast as the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM, which utilizes a Nano USM autofocus system. This system provides quick and precise autofocus, making it ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects like wildlife or sports.

Image Quality: Sharpness and Performance

Both lenses deliver excellent image quality, especially when considering their price points. The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is known for its sharpness and good contrast, while the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM offers slightly better performance at the wide end and slightly less sharpness at the telephoto end. However, both lenses produce images with minimal distortion and chromatic aberration, making them suitable for various photographic applications.

Size and Weight: Portability and Travel

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is a compact and lightweight lens, making it an excellent choice for travel photography. The Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM, while offering incredible versatility, is significantly larger and heavier due to its extended zoom range. If portability is a priority, the EF 24-105mm might be the better option.

Price and Value: Finding the Sweet Spot

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is generally more affordable than the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM. This price difference is justified by the difference in features and performance. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly lens that offers a good balance of quality and versatility, the EF 24-105mm might be the ideal choice. However, if you’re willing to invest in a lens that offers exceptional zoom range and performance, the RF 24-240mm is a worthy investment.

The Final Verdict: Choosing the Right Lens

Choosing between the Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences.
Here’s a breakdown to help you decide:

  • Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM: Ideal for everyday photography, landscapes, portraits, and travel. Offers a good balance of performance and affordability.
  • Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM: Ideal for photographers who need a versatile lens for a wide range of subjects, including wildlife and sports. Offers exceptional zoom range and autofocus performance.

Beyond the Lens: Exploring Other Options

While the Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM are excellent choices, it’s important to consider other options that might better suit your needs. For example, if you prioritize image quality and low-light performance, you might consider investing in a prime lens like the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS Macro STM or the Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM.

Embracing the Power of Choice

Ultimately, the best lens for you is the one that allows you to capture the images you envision. Take the time to research, compare, and consider your specific needs before making a decision. Don’t be afraid to experiment with different lenses to find the perfect fit for your photographic journey.

Information You Need to Know

Q: Can I use Canon EF lenses on a Canon EOS RP camera?
A: Yes, you can use Canon EF lenses on a Canon EOS RP camera using an EF-to-RF adapter. This adapter allows the camera to communicate with the lens and enables autofocus and other features.
Q: Is the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM a good lens for wildlife photography?
A: While the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM offers a long telephoto reach, its maximum aperture of f/6.3 at the telephoto end might limit its performance in low-light conditions or when shooting fast-moving subjects. For wildlife photography, a dedicated telephoto lens with a wider maximum aperture might be a better choice.
Q: What is the difference between STM and USM autofocus systems?
A: STM (stepping motor) autofocus is known for its quiet and smooth operation, making it ideal for video recording. USM (ultrasonic motor) autofocus is generally faster and more precise, making it suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects.
Q: Which lens is better for travel photography?
A: The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is a more compact and lightweight lens, making it a better choice for travel photography. However, the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4.6-6.3 IS USM offers a wider zoom range, which can be beneficial for capturing diverse subjects during your travels.

Was this page helpful?

Drew D.

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.
Back to top button