Mastering the art of DSLR shooting
Comparison

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III: The Battle of the Titans – Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Edition

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.

What To Know

  • The Canon EOS 6D Mark II boasts a full-frame sensor, while the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III utilizes a Micro Four Thirds sensor.
  • The larger sensor also allows for a shallower depth of field, making it ideal for portrait photography where you want to isolate the subject from the background.
  • The Canon EOS 6D Mark II boasts a classic DSLR design with a deep grip, providing a comfortable hold.

Choosing the right camera can be a daunting task, especially when faced with a plethora of options. Today, we’re diving into a head-to-head comparison between two popular contenders: the Canon EOS 6D Mark II with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lens and the **Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III**. Both cameras cater to photographers of various levels, but their strengths and weaknesses differ, making the choice depend heavily on your individual needs and preferences.

Full-Frame vs Micro Four Thirds: The Size and Weight Factor

The first and most noticeable difference lies in their sensor size. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II boasts a full-frame sensor, while the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III utilizes a Micro Four Thirds sensor. This translates to a significant size and weight difference. The Canon, with its larger sensor, is heavier and bulkier. This might be a drawback for travel photographers or those who prioritize portability. However, the full-frame sensor offers a larger surface area for capturing light, resulting in better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, with its Micro Four Thirds sensor, is significantly smaller and lighter. This makes it an excellent choice for travel, street photography, and situations where a compact camera is preferred. The smaller sensor also means that lenses for the Micro Four Thirds system are generally smaller and lighter, further enhancing portability.

Image Quality: A Tale of Two Sensors

Both cameras produce excellent image quality, but their strengths lie in different areas. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II, with its full-frame sensor, excels in low-light performance. It can capture images with less noise at higher ISO settings, giving you more flexibility in challenging lighting conditions. The larger sensor also allows for a shallower depth of field, making it ideal for portrait photography where you want to isolate the subject from the background.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, despite its smaller sensor, produces impressive image quality thanks to its advanced sensor technology and image processing. While it might not match the full-frame sensor in low-light performance, it boasts exceptional dynamic range, allowing you to recover detail in highlights and shadows. This makes it a great choice for landscape photography and situations where high contrast is present.

Autofocus: A Battle of Speed and Accuracy

When it comes to autofocus, both cameras offer impressive performance. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II utilizes a 45-point autofocus system with 27 cross-type points, providing reliable and accurate focusing. However, it’s not as fast as the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III boasts a 121-point autofocus system with 105 cross-type points, making it one of the fastest autofocus systems available. It excels in tracking moving subjects, making it an excellent choice for wildlife, sports, and action photography.

Video Capabilities: A Closer Look

Both cameras are capable of shooting high-quality videos, but their features and capabilities differ. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II can record 4K video at 30fps with a maximum bitrate of 100 Mbps. It also offers a variety of video recording options, including slow motion and time-lapse.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III offers 4K video recording at 30fps and 24fps, with a maximum bitrate of 237 Mbps. It also features a variety of video recording features, including C4K (Cinema 4K) at 24fps, 4K anamorphic video recording, and various frame rates for slow-motion footage.

Design and Features: A Matter of Preference

Both cameras offer a well-designed and ergonomic body. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II boasts a classic DSLR design with a deep grip, providing a comfortable hold. It features a 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD and a built-in electronic viewfinder.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, being a mirrorless camera, has a more compact and modern design. It features a 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD and a high-resolution electronic viewfinder. It also boasts a variety of features, including in-body image stabilization, weather sealing, and a variety of shooting modes.

The Verdict: Choosing the Right Camera for You

Choosing between the Canon EOS 6D Mark II + Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III depends on your individual needs and preferences.
Canon EOS 6D Mark II + Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is a great choice for photographers who prioritize:

  • Low-light performance: The full-frame sensor excels in low light.
  • Shallow depth of field: The larger sensor enables beautiful bokeh.
  • Classic DSLR design: The familiar DSLR ergonomics provide a comfortable hold.

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is a great choice for photographers who prioritize:

  • Portability: The smaller size and weight make it ideal for travel.
  • Fast autofocus: The 121-point autofocus system excels in tracking moving subjects.
  • Video capabilities: The advanced video recording features make it a great choice for videographers.

The Final Say: A Balanced Perspective

Both cameras are excellent choices and offer a wide range of features and capabilities. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II excels in low-light performance and depth of field, while the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III shines in portability, autofocus, and video capabilities. Ultimately, the best camera for you depends on your individual needs and preferences.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between a full-frame and a Micro Four Thirds sensor?
A: A full-frame sensor is larger than a Micro Four Thirds sensor. This results in better low-light performance, shallower depth of field, and larger files. However, full-frame cameras are generally larger and heavier.
Q: Which camera is better for wildlife photography?
A: The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is better for wildlife photography due to its fast autofocus system and in-body image stabilization.
Q: Which camera is better for travel photography?
A: The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is better for travel photography due to its smaller size and weight, making it more portable.
Q: Which camera is better for video recording?
A: The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III offers more advanced video recording features, including C4K and 4K anamorphic video recording.
Q: Which camera is better for beginners?
A: Both cameras are suitable for beginners, but the Canon EOS 6D Mark II might be easier to learn due to its traditional DSLR design.

Was this page helpful?

Drew D.

Drew is a passionate photographer and the founder of the popular camera review blog, "DrewCaptures." With over a decade of experience behind the lens, Drew has developed a deep understanding of the latest camera gear and technologies.
Back to top button