What To Know
- In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifications, performance, and overall value of the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm to help you make an informed choice.
- The Canon EF-S 18-200mm is made of a combination of plastic and metal, while the Sigma 18-200mm is constructed primarily of plastic.
- However, if you are on a budget or prefer a lighter lens, the Sigma 18-200mm is a solid option.
When it comes to versatile and convenient lenses for APS-C cameras, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm stand out as popular options. Both lenses offer a wide zoom range, making them suitable for various photography genres. However, there are key differences between these two lenses that photographers should consider before making a decision. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifications, performance, and overall value of the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm to help you make an informed choice.
Specifications
| Feature | Canon EF-S 18-200mm | Sigma 18-200mm |
| — | — | — |
| Focal Length | 18-200mm | 18-200mm |
| Aperture Range | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 0.45m | 0.45m |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 595g | 680g |
| Filter Size | 72mm | 72mm |
Image Quality
Both the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm produce sharp images throughout their zoom range. However, the Canon lens exhibits slightly better image quality at the wide end (18mm), while the Sigma lens performs better at the telephoto end (200mm). In terms of color accuracy, both lenses deliver vibrant and accurate colors.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus performance of the Canon EF-S 18-200mm is faster and more accurate than the Sigma 18-200mm. The Canon lens uses a ring-type ultrasonic motor (USM), which provides quick and precise autofocus, making it ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects.
Image Stabilization
Both lenses feature image stabilization, which helps reduce camera shake and produce sharper images, especially when shooting in low-light conditions or at longer focal lengths. The Canon EF-S 18-200mm uses a Hybrid Image Stabilizer system, while the Sigma 18-200mm employs an Optical Stabilizer. Both systems are effective at reducing blur and ensuring sharper images.
Build Quality
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm is made of a combination of plastic and metal, while the Sigma 18-200mm is constructed primarily of plastic. The Canon lens feels more robust and durable, while the Sigma lens is slightly lighter. Both lenses have a weather-resistant design, making them suitable for use in various weather conditions.
Price
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm is typically priced higher than the Sigma 18-200mm. The price difference can be attributed to the Canon lens‘s faster autofocus performance and slightly better image quality at the wide end.
Summary: Making the Right Choice
Both the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm are excellent lenses for APS-C cameras, offering a versatile zoom range and image stabilization. If you prioritize autofocus performance and image quality, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm is the better choice. However, if you are on a budget or prefer a lighter lens, the Sigma 18-200mm is a solid option. Ultimately, the best lens for you depends on your specific needs and preferences.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which lens has a wider aperture?
A: The Canon EF-S 18-200mm has a wider aperture (f/3.5-5.6) than the Sigma 18-200mm (f/3.5-6.3).
Q: Does the Sigma 18-200mm have full-time manual focus?
A: Yes, the Sigma 18-200mm supports full-time manual focus, allowing you to manually adjust the focus even when autofocus is engaged.
Q: Which lens is more compact?
A: The Sigma 18-200mm is slightly lighter and more compact than the Canon EF-S 18-200mm.
Q: Does the Canon EF-S 18-200mm have a zoom lock?
A: Yes, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm features a zoom lock to prevent the lens from extending unintentionally when not in use.
Q: Which lens is better for low-light photography?
A: The Canon EF-S 18-200mm has a wider aperture (f/3.5-5.6) than the Sigma 18-200mm (f/3.5-6.3), making it a better choice for low-light photography.
